Friday, July 10, 2009

Chuck Schumer Gets Message from Long Island Patriots

From Gathering of Eagles: NY

Patriots from the Conservative Society for Action, Gathering of Eagles, Active and the 912 Group rallied in front of the offices of Senator Charles Schumer to counter the staged pro-nationalized healthcare rally planned by MoveOn.org and ACORN.

The first moonbats arrived and almost immediately called the police because they hate free speech and any opposition to their agenda. One of their old biddies called me a racist for opposing health care for illegal immigrants. Unfortunately for them the first amendment is still enforced in this country and the police would not interfere with our counter protest.

Things went downhill for the Soros stooges from there. As more and more patriots arrived we outnumbered the moonbats by at least ten to one. The video cameras and interviews were all from our folks. The stooges were pwned!



Surely your senators can't wait to hear from you! Contact them here.

Fax a .DOC, .DOCX, or .PDF file free from your computer:

http://faxzero.com/
http://www.gotfreefax.com/
http://www.myfax.com/free/


__________

Maryam and Marzieh: Convicted of Being Christian

Reprinted from Voice of the Martyrs:

Maryam and Marzieh – In danger of being forgotten in Iran

maryam-and-mazrieh---2

Two Iranian Christian women, Maryam Rustampoor (27) and Marzieh Amirizadeh (30), continue to be held in Evin prison in Iran because of their Christian faith, unfairly labelled as ‘anti-government activists’, because of the hostility of the government towards practising Christians.

In the aftermath of the political turmoil in Iran, they are now in danger of being forgotten. One church leader from Iran said, “With so many hundreds of protestors now in the prison system, Maryam and Marzieh are likely to be forgotten.”

Arrested on March 5 , 2009, the two young women have now been in prison for four months. After being in solitary confinement for three weeks in May and early June, they were then put one small cell together for about two weeks. Then, following the arrests of thousands of protestors after the disputed presidential elections, Marzieh and Maryam were moved to a larger cell to make room for new prisoners. About 600 women were brought Evin prison during the days of the protests. There is still no clarity regarding their case. In one court session in June a judge told them that he would make sure they were both executed as ‘apostates’. Maryam and Marzieh have responded with courage, however, telling the judge to “expedite his sentence.”

“Maryam and Marzieh have demonstrated great courage and trust in God. They believe the promise of Jesus that they will be given the words to speak when they are taken before judges,” says Sam Yeghnazar, founder of Elam Ministries.

Please continue to pray for Maryam and Marzieh as they suffer in prison in Iran. Pray they will continue to experience the strengthening presence of God and that they will be a witness of the love and grace of Christ in Evin prison. We invite you to post a prayer on our Persecuted Church Prayer Wall.

Please also consider Maryam and Marzieh in prison at:

Evin Prison
Saadat Abad
Tehran
Islamic Republic of Iran

Yes, you can write in English but if you wish to compose a letter in Farsi, our US sister mission has an online tool that can help you. Click here.

Please note
When writing a letter, never mention the name of the source of your information or the name of any organization such as Voice of the Martyrs or Prisoner Alert. It is not dangerous for a prisoner to receive letters from individuals, but if an organization is mentioned they may be accused of links with ‘foreign organizations’ and receive harsher sentences. Also, please do not state anything negative about their government.


Hat tip: Atlas Shrugs and Jihad Watch

__________


Thursday, July 9, 2009

EPA Says Climate Bill Won't Help Environment! UPDATE: Senate Phone Meltdown

Yet another reason for Americans to look before we allow the Senate to push our economy over the cliff with Waxman-Markey:



The race is on for us to enter into a clean energy future? Only wealthy countries can afford to care for their environment, and only people with disposable income are able to divert funds away from food, clothing, and shelter to address other people's interests, not to mention the welfare of wildlife and uncultivated plants and trees, which in good economic times are mostly left to take fend for themselves, but in tough times are lucky if they are permitted to survive. Those who sincerely want clean air and a healthy environment should be aware that these are unaffordable luxuries to people who are struggling economically, which is immediately obvious to anyone who compares the environment in a poor ghetto with that in a wealthy suburb.

Proponents of cap and trade who are acting out of genuine concern for the environment (as opposed to opportunists who are milking the green-movement cash cow) might do well to look at the widespread catastrophic effects on the environment of anti-capitalist poverty in the former Soviet bloc, not to mention in China, India, and other places where the vast majority of people, of necessity, place feeding their families first on the list of priorities.

Hat tip: P.J. Gladnick at the Media Research Center, Michelle Malkin

UPDATE:

Michelle Malkin reports that "Senate Democrats have decided to delay action on cap-and-tax until after the August recess." This means that some Senate proponants of the bill are starting to weaken; Obama and Pelosi wanted this bill to shoot through the Senate. The longer it delays, the greater the number of Americans who will catch on to the scam.

Now is the time to double down with your opposition. Call, fax, email. The money you save will definitely be your own.

From Lipstick Underground via Temple of Mut via Michelle Malkin comes the following list of senators who could use some extra attention. (If your senators are not on the list, call them anyway. Somebody notices when those phones don't stop ringing, the email bandwidth seems to be shrinking, and the supply closet is out of fax paper.)

SENATORS TO HIT HARD:

Robert Byrd (WV) 202-224-3954, fax 202-228-0002
Evan Bayh (IN) 202-224-5623, fax 202-228-1377
Mark Begich (AK) 202-224-3004, fax 202-224-2354
Michael Bennet (CO) 202-224-5852, fax 202-228-5036
Jeff Bingaman (NM) 202-224-5521, fax 202-224-1792
Sherrod Brown (OH) 202-224-2315, fax 202-228-6321
Max Baucus (MT) 202-224-2651, fax 202-224-9412
Robert Casey (PA) 866-802-2833, fax 202-228-0604
Kent Conrad (ND) 202-224-2043, fax 202-224-7776
Byron Dorgan (ND) 202-224-2551, fax 202-224-1193
Kay Hagan (NC) 202-224-6342, fax 202-228-2563
Tim Johnson (SD) 202-224-5842
Mary Landrieu (LA) 202-224-5824, fax 202-224-9735
Carl Levin (MI) 202-224-6221, fax 202-224-1388
Blanche Lincoln (AR) 202-224-4843, fax 202-228-1371
Ben Nelson (NE) 202-224-6551, fax 202-228-0012
John D. Rockefeller (WV) 202-224-6472, fax 202-224-7665
Arlen Specter (PA) 202-224-4254, fax 202-228-1229
Debbie Stabenow (MI) 202-224-4822
Jon Tester (MT) 202-224-2644, fax 202-224-8594
Mark L. Pryor (AR) 202-224-2353, fax 202-228-0908
Olympia Snowe (ME) 800-432-1599, fax 202-224-1946
Susan Collins (ME) 202-224-2523, fax 202-224-2693
Gregg (NH) 202-224-3324
Lisa Murkowski (AK) 202-224-6665, fax 202-224-5301

And last, but not least (per Lipstick Underground’s request): McCain 202-224-2235, Fax: 202-228-2862

Other senators' contact info here.

Fax a .DOC, .DOCX, or .PDF file free from your computer:

http://faxzero.com/
http://www.gotfreefax.com/
http://www.myfax.com/free/


__________

Where Will Medical Tourists Go for Their Surgeries Next?

In her opinion piece at Investors Business Daily, "Coming Soon: The Nightmare from Up There," Sally Pipes writes about her Canadian mother's experience with socialized medicine:
In June 2005, she wasn't feeling well and thought she might have colon cancer. She asked for a colonoscopy but was told by her doctor that it was unnecessary. The doctor ordered an X-ray, which revealed nothing.

By December, she was 30 pounds lighter, bleeding — and finally eligible for care. She spent two days in the emergency room and two days in a transit lounge waiting for a room. A colonoscopy revealed advanced cancer. She died two weeks later.

And then there's this story:

Former Canadian Member of Parliament Belinda Stronach steadfastly opposed any privatization of Canadian health care while in office.

Yet in 2007, after being diagnosed with breast cancer, she effectively opted out of her beloved public system in order to have surgery in California. For most Canadians, such medical tourism is not an option.

I googled "Belinda Stronach" to see whether her California experience had changed Stronach's mind about Canada's socialized health care. This is what her spokesman, Greg MacEachern, had to say about the "personal and private matter between Belinda, her family and her physicians":

Belinda had one of her later-stage operations in California, after referral from her personal physicians in Toronto. Prior to this, Belinda had surgery and treatment in Toronto, and continues to receive follow-up treatment there.

[snip]

Belinda thinks very highly of the Canadian health-care system, and uses it when needed for herself and her children, as do all Canadians.

The later-stage surgery, it turns out, was breast reconstruction, which Stronach, a wealthy heiress, could well afford. She has since bought Canada a nice new breast reconstruction center. But Canadian breast cancer survivors' tax payments into socialized medicine don't cover that type of surgery, although U.S. private insurance usually does.

If socialized medicine takes root in the U.S., and Belinda couldn't take a flight to California for her surgery, where would she go? Today's top competitors for her surgical dollar would be Thailand, Singapore, India, Argentina, Costa Rica, Cuba, Jamaica, South Africa, Jordan, Malaysia, Hungary, Latvia, and Estonia.

I guess those surgeries will be for people well enough (and young enough) to make the trip, unlike Sally Pipes' mom.

Get ready, North America.

Bet you can't wait.

Note: There's still time to call or write your senators about Cap and Trade. The exorbitant hidden cost increases that cap and trade will bring, if it gets through the Senate, aren't going to make paying for that trip to Bangkok General Hospital any easier.

__________

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Recycling Terrorists: One Year Later, Freed Gitmo Guy Leads Taliban in Afghanistan

As every terrorist trainer knows, it's easier and more cost-effective to recycle a used terrorist than to recruit and train a brand new one.

But why does the U.S. have to help them out?

Case in point: A former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, Abdullah Gulam Rasoul, alias Abdullah Zakir, aka Mullah Abdul Qayam Zakir, a former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, now leads the reconstituted Taliban in Afghanistan, where American and British troops sacrificed their lives this week.

In 2007, Rasoul/Zakir was transferred from Guantanamo Bay to the custody of the Afghanistan government, which promptly released him in May of 2008. Now he is not only fighting American marines in Afghanistan, he is leading the fight against American marines there.

Remember when people voted for Barack Hussein Obama specifically because he championed releasing Gitmo detainees? Back in January of 2008, The Boston Globe reported that:

More than 80 volunteer lawyers for Guantanamo Bay detainees today endorsed Illinois Senator Barack Obama's presidential bid.

The attorneys said in a joint statement that they believed Obama was the best choice to roll back the Bush-Cheney administration's detention policies in the war on terrorism and thereby to "restore the rule of law, demonstrate our commitment to human rights, and repair our reputation in the world community." [italics mine]

What is not mentioned in this quote is which law is restored by releasing confirmed terrorists. Would that be Shariah law?

Jules Crittenden at Pajama's Media reported another case of U.S. restoration of the rights of Abdallah Salih al-Ajmi, a Kuwaiti lad captured while "studying the Koran" in Afghanistan. Al-Ajmi was sent home from Guantanamo for trial, where he was acquitted. Later, he blew himself up in Mosul, "taking seven Iraqi soldiers with him."

And then there's Said Ali al-Shihri, who, after being released from Guantanamo detention center, became Al Qaeda's No. 2 man in the Arabian Peninsula. He is suspected of being behind the "gruesome murders and abductions" on June 12 of nine foreigners in Yemen: four German adults, three small children, a British man and a south Korean woman. This group included a doctor and his family, two nurses, and an engineer and his wife.

The Pentagon estimates that "as many as 60 former detainees have resurfaced on foreign battlefields."

I've asked it before, and I ask it again: Do the people who passionately want Guantanamo detainees released to the world equally desire to take moral responsibility for the lives lost as a result?

Hat tip: The Lambeth Walk

__________

Related Posts:

Monday, July 6, 2009

Birds and Bees Get to Sue Obama? Green Energy's Fifth Column

Logic isn't exactly a valued asset these days, but some days even a casual observer must stop to wonder if anybody in the administration thinks anything through--ever.

Obama has decided that his latest czar, the "Regulatory Czar" should be Cass Sunstein, a Harvard law professor "who has suggested 'that animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives,'" against human beings in the civil court system.

I get it.
  • Deer and pheasants could sue hunters, thus eliminating the need for many weapons, seriously weakening support for the Second Amendment.
  • Fish could sue fishermen, putting Sarah Palin's commercial fisherman husband out of work: a nice touch.
  • Cattle could sue burger joints, making cattle ranching a thing of the past, thus greatly reducing methane and CO2 production.
  • Chickens could sue everybody else except vegetarians.
  • The state bird of California, the California Quail, surely would find sympathy--make that empathy--in the 9th Circuit Court for some transgression or other against its species; its image must have been slapped into the California seal without remuneration, or something. (There are people in Hollywood who can figure that out.)
With animals suing people, socialist progressives could get rid of all the bad guys in a few fell swoops, not to mention killing even the remotest possibility of an economic slowdown among ranks of ACLU lawyers.

Wait a second, are the Green Inhabitants of the future Emerald City on a Hill really as innocent as they believe they are? Hikers never swat a mosquito? Vegetarians never sneak a bite of tuna sushi? Progressives never prefer to use drug that's been tested on an animal first? Or choose a brain surgeon who didn't practice exclusively on a plastic or computer model of a human brain, but on an animal brain. (Unpleasant questions, I know, but reality beckons at times. Ask Ted Kennedy.)

All right. I'll start out with the premise that Greenies are perfect, perfect in every way: virtuous guardians of (almost) every kind of life, especially if it's not human life.

But their technologies aren't.

Take wind energy for example. Nice, clean, animal friendly, except for all the animals those enormous turbines kill each year. According to a 2004 California Energy Commission report, spinning "windmill" blades at the Altamont Wind Resource Area in California kill several thousand (up to around 5,000) wild birds per year, especially golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, American kestrels, and burrowing owls, but also waterfowl and songbirds with formerly glorious voices. Any critter flying by. After all, there's nothing like getting sucked up by a wind turbine and then being chopped to bits with a dull blade to help reduce CO2. Greenies call these incidents "avian collisions."

It's worse for bats, though. Useful little mammals that dine on mosquitos and other bugs at night while you sleep and live otherwise peaceful, non-invasive lives for about 30 years, producing a couple of offspring a year, unless they wander into the turbulence of a wind turbine, where the changed air pressure does truly horrible and wicked things to their bodies that are definitely not in Nature's scheme. At two wind "farms" in Virginia, researchers estimated that about 3,000 bats suffered a terrible fate in a mere six weeks, the length of the study.

The more recent the study, the higher the estimate of wildlife kill.

Will a fifth column of "extremist" birds and bees sue Obama and Congress? Or will a Congress made up almost exclusively of lawyers legislate that animals can sue not only people, but other animals. (Mice suing cats? PETA might like that, because it would be one less pet category to worry about.)

In the meantime, do a golden eagle a favor. Contact your Senator here, please, and register your opposition to Cap and Trade. Or, better yet, send an animal rights activist a copy of the image to the left and ask him or her to do the right thing too.
__________
Related Posts

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Declaration of Independence

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett
William Whipple
Massachusetts:
Samuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
Matthew Thornton

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Thomas Jefferson's Thoughts on Independence Day, 1826

Thomas Jefferson died on July 4, 1826, at the very hour that marked the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the momentous document he had largely authored and penned with his own hand, the Declaration of Independence.

Jefferson had been invited to join with other surviving signers to celebrate this event in Washington City. Too ill to travel, on June 24, eleven days before his death, he wrote to the mayor of Washington City to regretfully decline the invitation. Here is an excerpt from that letter:
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately by the grace of God. These are grounds of hope for others. For ourselves, let the annual return of this day forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them.
Jefferson's words still offer support to people desiring liberty around the globe.

I think especially today of the unnamed U.S. soldier believed captured by insurgents in Afghanistan, the liberated people of Iraq, the people suffering under tyranny in Iran, and the proud people of Honduras peacefully defending their constitution.


For excellent posts, informed comments, and helpful links on Honduras' lawful actions to divest themselves of a president who sought dictatorship, visit Critical Narrative and Legal Insurrection.

__________

Related Posts:

Cap and Trade Will Clobber the Poor

A new study by the Tax Foundation confirms the sad fact that every clear-thinking person already knows: Cap and Trade will bring the most suffering to the poorest among us because they pay the highest percentage of their incomes on fuel and electricity.

Astonishingly, Cap and Trade, if it passes the Senate or is implemented by Obama through policy means, will wipe out more than 6% of the incomes of the bottom 20 percent of American earners. This averages a $617 annual hit on incomes that aren't enough to begin with. This amount is the equivalent of almost doubling lower earners' federal payroll taxes.

Cap and Trade will most deprive seniors and young adults, single parents with dependent children, those dependent children of course, and low earning families in the South. Households over age 75 will pay an extra $830 per year, and households under age 25 will pay an extra $696.

The author of the study, economist Andrew Chamberlain, understands what the Congressional shape shifters are up to: "Cap-and-trade," he explains, "allows lawmakers to hide the costs of climate policy behind regulations rather than taxes."

Chamberlain's full study, "Who Pays for Climate Policy? New Estimates of the Household Burden and Economic Impact of a U.S. Cap-and-Trade System" is available here.

Think of the person you love who will be most hurt by Cap and Trade. Then click here.

__________
Related Posts:

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Cap and Trade: Your Home Isn't Your Castle In Emerald City


I've just viewed House Minority Leader John Boehler's one-hour review of the 300-page, 3 a.m. amendment to the Cap and Trade legislation that passed the House. Boehler's statement is sobering and sad; the amendment--not to mention the bill itself--is evidence of our legislature's surreal abandonment of reality, as though our country's financial situation can be redefined, at will, through politically fashionable, self-preening, venal, slothful, chronic irresponsibility in the legislative chambers. As though reality itself can be lied to as easily as one's constituency and be forced to conform to whatever fairytale has been cooked up for its consumption. You can watch the video yourself, here.

Since the 16th century at least in England, upon whose laws the American legal system was structured (wise Latino women notwithstanding), a man's home has been his castle, and our own fourth amendment prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures."

No more, according to the Cap-and-Trade heap of distress. As long as something can be defined as "green," it is to be considered "reasonable," and who wants to enjoy the privacy of their increasingly humble homes when they can have a federally-mandated army of greengoons stomping through American homes to make sure they meet the new national (not state, county, or municipality) Emerald City building and mortgage codes.

To start, a majority of our House of Representatives had no problem requiring that every home, multi-family dwelling unit, and commercial construction built in the United States meet all California housing standards. Whose idea is that?

If you plan on selling your house anywhere in the former land of the free, you must first have your house inspected by a special Emerald City inspector, who will check it for conformance with a federal energy rating that you will have no part in designing, and that, judging from the bill, might have no relationship to sanity. The inspector will check out your windows, doors, heating system, water heater, refrigerator, and other appliances for energy efficiency and, if these aren't up to the highest levels of Progressive Paradise (where money is never an obstacle) or other considerations (pending, some czar will hire an inexperienced 30-year-old to think them up after the bill is enacted) you will be required to replace those windows, doors, heating systems, appliances, etc. to meet the Emerald City standards before you can sell your house. Not exactly guaranteed to boost home sales.

Don't plan on selling your house, but you might want to make a few improvements? Expect the greengoons to take an interest. The federal government will require you to invite the green inspector to your home twice! Once before and once after the improvements, to do two (2) green-energy audits. I wonder what they price for that will be.

Think your metropolitis, hamlet, homeowners association, day care center, or senior citizen's apartment building will have something to say about their special concerns? Forget it. The legislation states that the Secretary of Energy's idea of what is green and what is possible will override everyone else's concerns (except the president's).

To enforce the new codes, the amendment recognizes, every home appraiser in the country will be required to undergo retraining. Every city and village in the country will be required to hire a team of professionals to keep up with the change that Obama supporters couldn't wait for, even tiny little places that have just a part-time mayor and a police force of two. Perhaps Cap and Trade is sounding the death-knell for small, low-budget communities that can't support big ACORN populations and don't require community organizers. To afford the new regulations, small communities will have to merge. Come to think of it, what possible use can a small rural community without community organizers be to our nation's politicians and labor unions?

Oh, yes. Somewhere along the line you'll be required to install special electric outlets for recharging electric car batteries. The government will tell you which kind of outlet they require.

I'm not making this up. If you haven't already seen Boehler's speech, watch the video, or listen to it in the background while you're doing something else.

While this nation slept, the Powers that Be dropped this amendment on us. This amendment and the bill it amends are going to cost 2.5 million American jobs each year and raise the price of steel (for example) by 30% - 40%. That should kill off a few American industries. What happens when Gov't Motors faces the engineering difficulties of making cars out of recycled tin-foil hats? Maybe they'll buy steel from China, which has zero environmental protections for Earth's atmosphere.

Time to call, write, email, and fax the Emerald City Senate.

__________
Related Posts:


__________

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Carbon Capture: Clean Coal or Taxpayers Get Taken to the Cleaners?

A funny thing happened while I was reading last week's issue of Ethanol Producer Magazine. A quote by a lawyer addressing a room full of ethanol producers caught my eye and link, link, click, click, I had fallen into the Alice's rabbit-hole future world of carbon capture. In this world there exists a potential industry for capturing that nasty pollutant exhaled by all sentient beings, CO2, and storing it underground, supposedly out of everyone's way. For a brief moment in time, at least, this industry will be highly lucrative for some lucky engineers because billions will be contributed by American taxpayers, you and me, for what the administration deems the good of the world.

My first unsuspecting step toward the rabbit hole occurred when I read a comment by Dave Crass, partner in a law firm that pays attention to such things as "carbon capture." Crass had a few words to the wise for his audience of ethanol producers:
Crass said the idea of a carbon cap-and-trade system is not going to die, even if federal lawmakers are unable to pass a bill. “If congress can’t do it, [President Barack Obama's] administration is going to,” he said. “Congress and the [U.S.] EPA are sort of in a little race to implement climate change regulation. If congress can’t agree on an approach, then the Obama administration is going to press forward with these regulatory approaches.
In Crass' humble opinion, then, it really doesn't matter what the American public desires or wants to pay for. What Obama wants, Obama gets. I can't say that any events I've witnessed since Obama's inauguration contradict that conclusion.

And then I came upon this little headline at Crass' Web site:
U.S. Department of Energy Makes $1.4 billion Available for Carbon Capture and Storage and Beneficial Carbon Dioxide Use
In a nutshell, the good ol' American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes provisions for funding "commercial deployment of carbon capture and storage technology," plus "innovative concepts for beneficial carbon dioxide use." I guess that Mother Nature has not supplied enough photosynthesis power to turn that CO2 stuff into corn, wheat, soybeans, and other primary sources of energy for human and other life forms.

Tune up your keypad, grant applications are due August 7, 2009 at 8:00 p.m. Eastern. Just tell the Department of Energy how you would use that money to "capture and sequester CO2 emissions from industrial sources into underground formations, including deep saline formations and deep geologic systems such as basalts, operating or depleted oil and gas fields, and unmineable coal seams," maybe "under a variety of geologic settings."

Or perhaps you could develop a "novel" approach for converting CO2"to usable products" other than the bubbles in your carbonated beverage.

Don't think somebody's not ahead of you though, way ahead. The International Business Times has been watching:

The U.S. Department of Energy took the next step to granting $1 billion to advance the "first commercial scale carbon capture and sequestration project in the country" developed by the FutureGen Alliance in Mattoon, Illinois. [italics mine].

Does this mean that FutureGen already has the billion on offer tied up? Or is this a different billion all together?

Dunno.

FutureGen is a "clean-coal" power plant project initiated under George Bush back in 2003. "Clean coal" in this case does not mean scrubbing the sooty black stuff out of emissions before releasing them into the atmosphere. No. Here in the U.S. we already have that technology. It means scrubbing the almost non-existent CO2 out of the emissions, in case some escaped and maliciously drifted over a soybean plant, causing it to grow an extra soybean or two.

The Department of Energy pulled its funding of FutureGen in January of 2008 as the result of cost overruns caused by inflation and through-the-roof increases in the costs of steel, concrete, and power-plant components. Those raw material costs were rising dramatically because other countries, like China and India, were building hundreds of coal-burning power plants, many without any kind of scrubbers. (The cap-and-trade bill that the House of Representives just passed ensures that American taxpayers pay China and other countries to scrub that black stuff out of their coal-fired manufacturing plants, or at least tell us that they did so--no inspectors required.)

Obama is giving FutureGen another chance, this time in the form of more than a billion dollars (to start), about a third of the projected La La Land cost, sans overruns. Obama has a large vocabulary, they say, but cost overruns, America has learned from experience, doesn't seem to have made it into his glossary.

The other two thirds of FutureGen's cost was supposed to be carried by 11 power companies from the U.S., UK, Australia, and China. Recently, two of the biggest stakeholders in the project, American Electric Power Co., and Southern Co. backed out of the deal, billion-dollar government handout notwithstanding.

There are a lot of reasons why a giant American power company might want to pull out of a "clean-coal" consortium in the middle of a war on energy use in the middle of a stock market collapse in the middle of a global economic crisis. Among those reasons, may be, just maybe, that it doesn't want one of Obama's czars moving into a corner office. One thing leads to another, and, these days, you never know.

The only thing you know for sure is: What Obama wants, Obama gets.

Just a thought.


Monday, June 29, 2009

Aloha Kumbaya: Hawaiians Ask Obama for Uighurs

When Robert Greenwell of the Hawaii County Council and Ed Coll and his buddies at the Kaua'i Alliance for Peace and Social Justice think aloha, a word that signifies many kinds of love and welcome, they think Uighur terrorist.

Recently, Greenwell and the Alliance independently wrote to Barack Hussein Obama asking him to send the Uighur terror campers at Gitmo to Hawaii where they can bask in warm sunshine and tender aloha.

Not that there isn't some gentle rivalry between Greenwell and the Alliance over which is the most empathic. Greenwell wants the Uighurs on his island, the Big Island of Kona, but the Peace and Social Justice crew want to entertain them on Kaua'i. Via Canada Free Press:
The idea isn’t to incarcerate the prisoners here, the councilman said, but to release them and begin a process of healing and forgiveness.… “I think if we want to be known as a place of love and aloha, this is a place to express it."
The Alliance for Peace and Justice agrees:
“What better aloha than this humanitarian gesture from Hawai‘i already known for its rich and diverse ethnic population? Hawai‘i can much more easily absorb these men than our Pacific Island neighbors in Palau."
It is a fact that the Gitmo Uighurs are holding out for better digs than Palau. They already have turned down a move to China, Algeria, Tunisia, Syria, and Uzbekistan, because those are places that the ex terror campers wouldn't feel, well, safe. Palau, besides being short on Muslims and long on Christians, doesn't have an army to defend the Uighurs from kidnapping by the Chinese.

But would they like Hawaii any better, with that state's large population of Chinese?

Kumbaya.

Greenwell and the Peace and Justice pacifists better hope the Uighurs don't find out that North Korea is pointing nuclear missiles at the Aloha State. That could be a deal breaker.


Hat tip: Hawai'i Free Press
__________
Related Posts:

Gitmo Uighurs Hold Out for a Better Deal
Released Gitmo Detainee Kills Children, Nurses, Doctor, Others?
Bermudians Tell Premier: Send 'Em Back to Gitmo

Which is More Fun: Bermuda or Tora Bora?
Uighur Update: How Sweet It Is
Bermuda and South Pacific Vacations for Chinese Uighur Muslim Terrorists

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Meditation: Hear, Hear, John Adams!

Robert G. Morrison at frcblog tells an amusing story about John Adams' famous prayer for the occupants of the White House:

My favorite John Adams story dates to the year 2000. Then, Bill Clinton occupied the Oval Office. That December, the Clintons invited their nearest and dearest friends to celebrate the two hundred years that the White House had been the Executive Mansion. They asked David McCullough to come and read from his wonderful biography of John Adams.

As the liberal Washington Post columnist Mary McGrory reported, McCullough ended with John Adams’ famous prayer, the one FDR had had engraved in the mantle in the State Dining Room:

“I pray Heaven to bestow the best blessings on this house and all that shall hereafter inhabit. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof.”

Miss McGrory wrote that when the prayer was read, all of Bill Clinton’s best friends looked at their shoes in embarrassment. Honest John Adams had crafted that inspiring petition in 1800. He hurled it like a javelin two centuries into the future and he punctured Bill Clinton’s pretensions with his pointed prayer. God bless John Adams!

Amen.


Saturday, June 27, 2009

NY Democrat Arcuri against Cap & Trade, NY Republican McHugh for It!

NY Democrat Michael Arcuri did the right thing yesterday by voting no for Cap and Trade.

If you would like to join me in thanking Congressman Arcuri, click here. Democrats who stand with America and not against us need to hear that we are paying attention.

(Photo shows Arcuri with Utica, NY, National Guard in Afghanistan.)

On the other hand, NY Republican John McHugh was one of only 8 Republicans who want to join Obama in the Cap-and-Tax Pickpocket Party. John McHugh's contact info is here. McHugh might not care whether his constituents remember this vote: he's moving on.

Yes, welcome John McHugh as Obama's new Secretary of the Army.

Uh huh.

Gathering of Eagles: NY observed, "Now lets see how he deals with people for whom honor actually means something."

To find out the names and phone numbers of the other Cap-and-Tax Republicans and the 44 Dems who voted against the bill, go to this post at Michelle Malkin.
__________

Related Posts:

Gov't Hires Imams to Give Money to Muslims: Iraq Vet Sues

Yes, it's true. If you've been following my blog, you know that the federal government has hired foreign imams to give money to Islamic charities that are involved in the prosecution of Christians and Jews and in the subjugation of women. Not just any imams, either.

Here's the latest insight via the Thomas More Law Center:



What ever happened to separation of mosque and state?
__________

Related Posts:

Friday, June 26, 2009

Cap and Trade: 77 Cents More Per Gallon!

Via Michelle Malkin:
One in six U.S. refineries probably would close by 2020 as the cost of carbon allowances erases profits, according to the American Petroleum Institute, a Washington trade group known as API. Carbon permits would add 77 cents a gallon to the price of gasoline, said Russell Jones, the API’s senior economic adviser.
Call your Representative, here. If you've already called, call again. Some Congressmen are getting very nervous about a yes vote.

__________

Related Posts:

Calling All Carbon-Based Life Forms: Cap and Trade Vote Today

All known life is carbon based. Carbon, combined with other elements, especially oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen, is the stuff of which life is made and on which all living organisms depend.

Today, the House of Representatives will be voting on a very dangerous scam known as Cap and Trade, which, under the guise of improving the environment, will penalize some of those who create carbon dioxide and reward some of those who use it, and vice versa. Razor-sharp lawyers in Congress have been cutting deals behind closed doors that decide which is which, based purely, they want you to believe, on what is best for the environment and what is best for you.

Squirrels, who create carbon dioxide by breathing, are exempt (so far), as are the trees they live in, which absorb the carbon dioxide exhaled by the squirrels.

Your favorite member of the animal kingdom will not be exempt, however, because pet food, pet toys, and veterinary supplies will go up in price.

In fact, in America, all food, energy, and manufactured goods, including medicine, will cost more as a direct result of Cap and Trade, but the environment will not improve as a result.

In China, though, food, energy, and manufactured goods will be exempt from Cap and Trade charges. That will be nice for the Chinese who get jobs that Americans used to have. Maybe your job.

Please tell your Congress: CO2 is okay by you, or face the biggest tax increase in the history of the U.S.

The economic slavery you prevent may be your own.

Contact your Representative here. Al Gore as been on the phone all week, and the last time that happened, the second largest oil reserve in the U.S. got handed to a big oil company. No joke.
__________

Related Posts:

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Today's Massacre in Tehran


You can't say it better than this:

Published at Bookworm Room:

I got this email from Steve Schippert:

It’s graphic. There is no nuance. And it’s why I am done debating otherwise intelligent friends on the aptness, nay brilliance, of our president’s near silence in condemnation of the Iranian regime which today executed its own Tienanmen Square in central Tehran.

[snipped graphic photograph]

Bludgeoning women to death, who represent the greatest true threat to the regime. Herding bus loads of Iranians into the square and then unleashing hundreds of Basij upon them from their concealed staging area - a street-side mosque. With axes, rifles, hand guns, clubs and gas, they commenced the killing spree; throwing people off of pedestrian bridges, gang beating defenseless women, shooting into the crowd and wading into them with axes.

[snip]

Today, I am done entertaining excuses for moral cowardice. Done.

My tears earlier today have given way to rage. Rage at a regime so brutally murdering the unarmed and peaceful. Rage at those who make eloquent excuses for a man who hesitates “because we don’t know how this is going to turn out.”

Yes we do. Count them. Quietly. To yourself.

__________

Related posts: