Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Recycling Terrorists: One Year Later, Freed Gitmo Guy Leads Taliban in Afghanistan

As every terrorist trainer knows, it's easier and more cost-effective to recycle a used terrorist than to recruit and train a brand new one.

But why does the U.S. have to help them out?

Case in point: A former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, Abdullah Gulam Rasoul, alias Abdullah Zakir, aka Mullah Abdul Qayam Zakir, a former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, now leads the reconstituted Taliban in Afghanistan, where American and British troops sacrificed their lives this week.

In 2007, Rasoul/Zakir was transferred from Guantanamo Bay to the custody of the Afghanistan government, which promptly released him in May of 2008. Now he is not only fighting American marines in Afghanistan, he is leading the fight against American marines there.

Remember when people voted for Barack Hussein Obama specifically because he championed releasing Gitmo detainees? Back in January of 2008, The Boston Globe reported that:

More than 80 volunteer lawyers for Guantanamo Bay detainees today endorsed Illinois Senator Barack Obama's presidential bid.

The attorneys said in a joint statement that they believed Obama was the best choice to roll back the Bush-Cheney administration's detention policies in the war on terrorism and thereby to "restore the rule of law, demonstrate our commitment to human rights, and repair our reputation in the world community." [italics mine]

What is not mentioned in this quote is which law is restored by releasing confirmed terrorists. Would that be Shariah law?

Jules Crittenden at Pajama's Media reported another case of U.S. restoration of the rights of Abdallah Salih al-Ajmi, a Kuwaiti lad captured while "studying the Koran" in Afghanistan. Al-Ajmi was sent home from Guantanamo for trial, where he was acquitted. Later, he blew himself up in Mosul, "taking seven Iraqi soldiers with him."

And then there's Said Ali al-Shihri, who, after being released from Guantanamo detention center, became Al Qaeda's No. 2 man in the Arabian Peninsula. He is suspected of being behind the "gruesome murders and abductions" on June 12 of nine foreigners in Yemen: four German adults, three small children, a British man and a south Korean woman. This group included a doctor and his family, two nurses, and an engineer and his wife.

The Pentagon estimates that "as many as 60 former detainees have resurfaced on foreign battlefields."

I've asked it before, and I ask it again: Do the people who passionately want Guantanamo detainees released to the world equally desire to take moral responsibility for the lives lost as a result?

Hat tip: The Lambeth Walk

__________

Related Posts:

Monday, July 6, 2009

Birds and Bees Get to Sue Obama? Green Energy's Fifth Column

Logic isn't exactly a valued asset these days, but some days even a casual observer must stop to wonder if anybody in the administration thinks anything through--ever.

Obama has decided that his latest czar, the "Regulatory Czar" should be Cass Sunstein, a Harvard law professor "who has suggested 'that animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives,'" against human beings in the civil court system.

I get it.
  • Deer and pheasants could sue hunters, thus eliminating the need for many weapons, seriously weakening support for the Second Amendment.
  • Fish could sue fishermen, putting Sarah Palin's commercial fisherman husband out of work: a nice touch.
  • Cattle could sue burger joints, making cattle ranching a thing of the past, thus greatly reducing methane and CO2 production.
  • Chickens could sue everybody else except vegetarians.
  • The state bird of California, the California Quail, surely would find sympathy--make that empathy--in the 9th Circuit Court for some transgression or other against its species; its image must have been slapped into the California seal without remuneration, or something. (There are people in Hollywood who can figure that out.)
With animals suing people, socialist progressives could get rid of all the bad guys in a few fell swoops, not to mention killing even the remotest possibility of an economic slowdown among ranks of ACLU lawyers.

Wait a second, are the Green Inhabitants of the future Emerald City on a Hill really as innocent as they believe they are? Hikers never swat a mosquito? Vegetarians never sneak a bite of tuna sushi? Progressives never prefer to use drug that's been tested on an animal first? Or choose a brain surgeon who didn't practice exclusively on a plastic or computer model of a human brain, but on an animal brain. (Unpleasant questions, I know, but reality beckons at times. Ask Ted Kennedy.)

All right. I'll start out with the premise that Greenies are perfect, perfect in every way: virtuous guardians of (almost) every kind of life, especially if it's not human life.

But their technologies aren't.

Take wind energy for example. Nice, clean, animal friendly, except for all the animals those enormous turbines kill each year. According to a 2004 California Energy Commission report, spinning "windmill" blades at the Altamont Wind Resource Area in California kill several thousand (up to around 5,000) wild birds per year, especially golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, American kestrels, and burrowing owls, but also waterfowl and songbirds with formerly glorious voices. Any critter flying by. After all, there's nothing like getting sucked up by a wind turbine and then being chopped to bits with a dull blade to help reduce CO2. Greenies call these incidents "avian collisions."

It's worse for bats, though. Useful little mammals that dine on mosquitos and other bugs at night while you sleep and live otherwise peaceful, non-invasive lives for about 30 years, producing a couple of offspring a year, unless they wander into the turbulence of a wind turbine, where the changed air pressure does truly horrible and wicked things to their bodies that are definitely not in Nature's scheme. At two wind "farms" in Virginia, researchers estimated that about 3,000 bats suffered a terrible fate in a mere six weeks, the length of the study.

The more recent the study, the higher the estimate of wildlife kill.

Will a fifth column of "extremist" birds and bees sue Obama and Congress? Or will a Congress made up almost exclusively of lawyers legislate that animals can sue not only people, but other animals. (Mice suing cats? PETA might like that, because it would be one less pet category to worry about.)

In the meantime, do a golden eagle a favor. Contact your Senator here, please, and register your opposition to Cap and Trade. Or, better yet, send an animal rights activist a copy of the image to the left and ask him or her to do the right thing too.
__________
Related Posts

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Declaration of Independence

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett
William Whipple
Massachusetts:
Samuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
Matthew Thornton

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Thomas Jefferson's Thoughts on Independence Day, 1826

Thomas Jefferson died on July 4, 1826, at the very hour that marked the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the momentous document he had largely authored and penned with his own hand, the Declaration of Independence.

Jefferson had been invited to join with other surviving signers to celebrate this event in Washington City. Too ill to travel, on June 24, eleven days before his death, he wrote to the mayor of Washington City to regretfully decline the invitation. Here is an excerpt from that letter:
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately by the grace of God. These are grounds of hope for others. For ourselves, let the annual return of this day forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them.
Jefferson's words still offer support to people desiring liberty around the globe.

I think especially today of the unnamed U.S. soldier believed captured by insurgents in Afghanistan, the liberated people of Iraq, the people suffering under tyranny in Iran, and the proud people of Honduras peacefully defending their constitution.


For excellent posts, informed comments, and helpful links on Honduras' lawful actions to divest themselves of a president who sought dictatorship, visit Critical Narrative and Legal Insurrection.

__________

Related Posts:

Cap and Trade Will Clobber the Poor

A new study by the Tax Foundation confirms the sad fact that every clear-thinking person already knows: Cap and Trade will bring the most suffering to the poorest among us because they pay the highest percentage of their incomes on fuel and electricity.

Astonishingly, Cap and Trade, if it passes the Senate or is implemented by Obama through policy means, will wipe out more than 6% of the incomes of the bottom 20 percent of American earners. This averages a $617 annual hit on incomes that aren't enough to begin with. This amount is the equivalent of almost doubling lower earners' federal payroll taxes.

Cap and Trade will most deprive seniors and young adults, single parents with dependent children, those dependent children of course, and low earning families in the South. Households over age 75 will pay an extra $830 per year, and households under age 25 will pay an extra $696.

The author of the study, economist Andrew Chamberlain, understands what the Congressional shape shifters are up to: "Cap-and-trade," he explains, "allows lawmakers to hide the costs of climate policy behind regulations rather than taxes."

Chamberlain's full study, "Who Pays for Climate Policy? New Estimates of the Household Burden and Economic Impact of a U.S. Cap-and-Trade System" is available here.

Think of the person you love who will be most hurt by Cap and Trade. Then click here.

__________
Related Posts:

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Cap and Trade: Your Home Isn't Your Castle In Emerald City


I've just viewed House Minority Leader John Boehler's one-hour review of the 300-page, 3 a.m. amendment to the Cap and Trade legislation that passed the House. Boehler's statement is sobering and sad; the amendment--not to mention the bill itself--is evidence of our legislature's surreal abandonment of reality, as though our country's financial situation can be redefined, at will, through politically fashionable, self-preening, venal, slothful, chronic irresponsibility in the legislative chambers. As though reality itself can be lied to as easily as one's constituency and be forced to conform to whatever fairytale has been cooked up for its consumption. You can watch the video yourself, here.

Since the 16th century at least in England, upon whose laws the American legal system was structured (wise Latino women notwithstanding), a man's home has been his castle, and our own fourth amendment prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures."

No more, according to the Cap-and-Trade heap of distress. As long as something can be defined as "green," it is to be considered "reasonable," and who wants to enjoy the privacy of their increasingly humble homes when they can have a federally-mandated army of greengoons stomping through American homes to make sure they meet the new national (not state, county, or municipality) Emerald City building and mortgage codes.

To start, a majority of our House of Representatives had no problem requiring that every home, multi-family dwelling unit, and commercial construction built in the United States meet all California housing standards. Whose idea is that?

If you plan on selling your house anywhere in the former land of the free, you must first have your house inspected by a special Emerald City inspector, who will check it for conformance with a federal energy rating that you will have no part in designing, and that, judging from the bill, might have no relationship to sanity. The inspector will check out your windows, doors, heating system, water heater, refrigerator, and other appliances for energy efficiency and, if these aren't up to the highest levels of Progressive Paradise (where money is never an obstacle) or other considerations (pending, some czar will hire an inexperienced 30-year-old to think them up after the bill is enacted) you will be required to replace those windows, doors, heating systems, appliances, etc. to meet the Emerald City standards before you can sell your house. Not exactly guaranteed to boost home sales.

Don't plan on selling your house, but you might want to make a few improvements? Expect the greengoons to take an interest. The federal government will require you to invite the green inspector to your home twice! Once before and once after the improvements, to do two (2) green-energy audits. I wonder what they price for that will be.

Think your metropolitis, hamlet, homeowners association, day care center, or senior citizen's apartment building will have something to say about their special concerns? Forget it. The legislation states that the Secretary of Energy's idea of what is green and what is possible will override everyone else's concerns (except the president's).

To enforce the new codes, the amendment recognizes, every home appraiser in the country will be required to undergo retraining. Every city and village in the country will be required to hire a team of professionals to keep up with the change that Obama supporters couldn't wait for, even tiny little places that have just a part-time mayor and a police force of two. Perhaps Cap and Trade is sounding the death-knell for small, low-budget communities that can't support big ACORN populations and don't require community organizers. To afford the new regulations, small communities will have to merge. Come to think of it, what possible use can a small rural community without community organizers be to our nation's politicians and labor unions?

Oh, yes. Somewhere along the line you'll be required to install special electric outlets for recharging electric car batteries. The government will tell you which kind of outlet they require.

I'm not making this up. If you haven't already seen Boehler's speech, watch the video, or listen to it in the background while you're doing something else.

While this nation slept, the Powers that Be dropped this amendment on us. This amendment and the bill it amends are going to cost 2.5 million American jobs each year and raise the price of steel (for example) by 30% - 40%. That should kill off a few American industries. What happens when Gov't Motors faces the engineering difficulties of making cars out of recycled tin-foil hats? Maybe they'll buy steel from China, which has zero environmental protections for Earth's atmosphere.

Time to call, write, email, and fax the Emerald City Senate.

__________
Related Posts:


__________

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Carbon Capture: Clean Coal or Taxpayers Get Taken to the Cleaners?

A funny thing happened while I was reading last week's issue of Ethanol Producer Magazine. A quote by a lawyer addressing a room full of ethanol producers caught my eye and link, link, click, click, I had fallen into the Alice's rabbit-hole future world of carbon capture. In this world there exists a potential industry for capturing that nasty pollutant exhaled by all sentient beings, CO2, and storing it underground, supposedly out of everyone's way. For a brief moment in time, at least, this industry will be highly lucrative for some lucky engineers because billions will be contributed by American taxpayers, you and me, for what the administration deems the good of the world.

My first unsuspecting step toward the rabbit hole occurred when I read a comment by Dave Crass, partner in a law firm that pays attention to such things as "carbon capture." Crass had a few words to the wise for his audience of ethanol producers:
Crass said the idea of a carbon cap-and-trade system is not going to die, even if federal lawmakers are unable to pass a bill. “If congress can’t do it, [President Barack Obama's] administration is going to,” he said. “Congress and the [U.S.] EPA are sort of in a little race to implement climate change regulation. If congress can’t agree on an approach, then the Obama administration is going to press forward with these regulatory approaches.
In Crass' humble opinion, then, it really doesn't matter what the American public desires or wants to pay for. What Obama wants, Obama gets. I can't say that any events I've witnessed since Obama's inauguration contradict that conclusion.

And then I came upon this little headline at Crass' Web site:
U.S. Department of Energy Makes $1.4 billion Available for Carbon Capture and Storage and Beneficial Carbon Dioxide Use
In a nutshell, the good ol' American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes provisions for funding "commercial deployment of carbon capture and storage technology," plus "innovative concepts for beneficial carbon dioxide use." I guess that Mother Nature has not supplied enough photosynthesis power to turn that CO2 stuff into corn, wheat, soybeans, and other primary sources of energy for human and other life forms.

Tune up your keypad, grant applications are due August 7, 2009 at 8:00 p.m. Eastern. Just tell the Department of Energy how you would use that money to "capture and sequester CO2 emissions from industrial sources into underground formations, including deep saline formations and deep geologic systems such as basalts, operating or depleted oil and gas fields, and unmineable coal seams," maybe "under a variety of geologic settings."

Or perhaps you could develop a "novel" approach for converting CO2"to usable products" other than the bubbles in your carbonated beverage.

Don't think somebody's not ahead of you though, way ahead. The International Business Times has been watching:

The U.S. Department of Energy took the next step to granting $1 billion to advance the "first commercial scale carbon capture and sequestration project in the country" developed by the FutureGen Alliance in Mattoon, Illinois. [italics mine].

Does this mean that FutureGen already has the billion on offer tied up? Or is this a different billion all together?

Dunno.

FutureGen is a "clean-coal" power plant project initiated under George Bush back in 2003. "Clean coal" in this case does not mean scrubbing the sooty black stuff out of emissions before releasing them into the atmosphere. No. Here in the U.S. we already have that technology. It means scrubbing the almost non-existent CO2 out of the emissions, in case some escaped and maliciously drifted over a soybean plant, causing it to grow an extra soybean or two.

The Department of Energy pulled its funding of FutureGen in January of 2008 as the result of cost overruns caused by inflation and through-the-roof increases in the costs of steel, concrete, and power-plant components. Those raw material costs were rising dramatically because other countries, like China and India, were building hundreds of coal-burning power plants, many without any kind of scrubbers. (The cap-and-trade bill that the House of Representives just passed ensures that American taxpayers pay China and other countries to scrub that black stuff out of their coal-fired manufacturing plants, or at least tell us that they did so--no inspectors required.)

Obama is giving FutureGen another chance, this time in the form of more than a billion dollars (to start), about a third of the projected La La Land cost, sans overruns. Obama has a large vocabulary, they say, but cost overruns, America has learned from experience, doesn't seem to have made it into his glossary.

The other two thirds of FutureGen's cost was supposed to be carried by 11 power companies from the U.S., UK, Australia, and China. Recently, two of the biggest stakeholders in the project, American Electric Power Co., and Southern Co. backed out of the deal, billion-dollar government handout notwithstanding.

There are a lot of reasons why a giant American power company might want to pull out of a "clean-coal" consortium in the middle of a war on energy use in the middle of a stock market collapse in the middle of a global economic crisis. Among those reasons, may be, just maybe, that it doesn't want one of Obama's czars moving into a corner office. One thing leads to another, and, these days, you never know.

The only thing you know for sure is: What Obama wants, Obama gets.

Just a thought.


Monday, June 29, 2009

Aloha Kumbaya: Hawaiians Ask Obama for Uighurs

When Robert Greenwell of the Hawaii County Council and Ed Coll and his buddies at the Kaua'i Alliance for Peace and Social Justice think aloha, a word that signifies many kinds of love and welcome, they think Uighur terrorist.

Recently, Greenwell and the Alliance independently wrote to Barack Hussein Obama asking him to send the Uighur terror campers at Gitmo to Hawaii where they can bask in warm sunshine and tender aloha.

Not that there isn't some gentle rivalry between Greenwell and the Alliance over which is the most empathic. Greenwell wants the Uighurs on his island, the Big Island of Kona, but the Peace and Social Justice crew want to entertain them on Kaua'i. Via Canada Free Press:
The idea isn’t to incarcerate the prisoners here, the councilman said, but to release them and begin a process of healing and forgiveness.… “I think if we want to be known as a place of love and aloha, this is a place to express it."
The Alliance for Peace and Justice agrees:
“What better aloha than this humanitarian gesture from Hawai‘i already known for its rich and diverse ethnic population? Hawai‘i can much more easily absorb these men than our Pacific Island neighbors in Palau."
It is a fact that the Gitmo Uighurs are holding out for better digs than Palau. They already have turned down a move to China, Algeria, Tunisia, Syria, and Uzbekistan, because those are places that the ex terror campers wouldn't feel, well, safe. Palau, besides being short on Muslims and long on Christians, doesn't have an army to defend the Uighurs from kidnapping by the Chinese.

But would they like Hawaii any better, with that state's large population of Chinese?

Kumbaya.

Greenwell and the Peace and Justice pacifists better hope the Uighurs don't find out that North Korea is pointing nuclear missiles at the Aloha State. That could be a deal breaker.


Hat tip: Hawai'i Free Press
__________
Related Posts:

Gitmo Uighurs Hold Out for a Better Deal
Released Gitmo Detainee Kills Children, Nurses, Doctor, Others?
Bermudians Tell Premier: Send 'Em Back to Gitmo

Which is More Fun: Bermuda or Tora Bora?
Uighur Update: How Sweet It Is
Bermuda and South Pacific Vacations for Chinese Uighur Muslim Terrorists

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Meditation: Hear, Hear, John Adams!

Robert G. Morrison at frcblog tells an amusing story about John Adams' famous prayer for the occupants of the White House:

My favorite John Adams story dates to the year 2000. Then, Bill Clinton occupied the Oval Office. That December, the Clintons invited their nearest and dearest friends to celebrate the two hundred years that the White House had been the Executive Mansion. They asked David McCullough to come and read from his wonderful biography of John Adams.

As the liberal Washington Post columnist Mary McGrory reported, McCullough ended with John Adams’ famous prayer, the one FDR had had engraved in the mantle in the State Dining Room:

“I pray Heaven to bestow the best blessings on this house and all that shall hereafter inhabit. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof.”

Miss McGrory wrote that when the prayer was read, all of Bill Clinton’s best friends looked at their shoes in embarrassment. Honest John Adams had crafted that inspiring petition in 1800. He hurled it like a javelin two centuries into the future and he punctured Bill Clinton’s pretensions with his pointed prayer. God bless John Adams!

Amen.


Saturday, June 27, 2009

NY Democrat Arcuri against Cap & Trade, NY Republican McHugh for It!

NY Democrat Michael Arcuri did the right thing yesterday by voting no for Cap and Trade.

If you would like to join me in thanking Congressman Arcuri, click here. Democrats who stand with America and not against us need to hear that we are paying attention.

(Photo shows Arcuri with Utica, NY, National Guard in Afghanistan.)

On the other hand, NY Republican John McHugh was one of only 8 Republicans who want to join Obama in the Cap-and-Tax Pickpocket Party. John McHugh's contact info is here. McHugh might not care whether his constituents remember this vote: he's moving on.

Yes, welcome John McHugh as Obama's new Secretary of the Army.

Uh huh.

Gathering of Eagles: NY observed, "Now lets see how he deals with people for whom honor actually means something."

To find out the names and phone numbers of the other Cap-and-Tax Republicans and the 44 Dems who voted against the bill, go to this post at Michelle Malkin.
__________

Related Posts:

Gov't Hires Imams to Give Money to Muslims: Iraq Vet Sues

Yes, it's true. If you've been following my blog, you know that the federal government has hired foreign imams to give money to Islamic charities that are involved in the prosecution of Christians and Jews and in the subjugation of women. Not just any imams, either.

Here's the latest insight via the Thomas More Law Center:



What ever happened to separation of mosque and state?
__________

Related Posts:

Friday, June 26, 2009

Cap and Trade: 77 Cents More Per Gallon!

Via Michelle Malkin:
One in six U.S. refineries probably would close by 2020 as the cost of carbon allowances erases profits, according to the American Petroleum Institute, a Washington trade group known as API. Carbon permits would add 77 cents a gallon to the price of gasoline, said Russell Jones, the API’s senior economic adviser.
Call your Representative, here. If you've already called, call again. Some Congressmen are getting very nervous about a yes vote.

__________

Related Posts:

Calling All Carbon-Based Life Forms: Cap and Trade Vote Today

All known life is carbon based. Carbon, combined with other elements, especially oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen, is the stuff of which life is made and on which all living organisms depend.

Today, the House of Representatives will be voting on a very dangerous scam known as Cap and Trade, which, under the guise of improving the environment, will penalize some of those who create carbon dioxide and reward some of those who use it, and vice versa. Razor-sharp lawyers in Congress have been cutting deals behind closed doors that decide which is which, based purely, they want you to believe, on what is best for the environment and what is best for you.

Squirrels, who create carbon dioxide by breathing, are exempt (so far), as are the trees they live in, which absorb the carbon dioxide exhaled by the squirrels.

Your favorite member of the animal kingdom will not be exempt, however, because pet food, pet toys, and veterinary supplies will go up in price.

In fact, in America, all food, energy, and manufactured goods, including medicine, will cost more as a direct result of Cap and Trade, but the environment will not improve as a result.

In China, though, food, energy, and manufactured goods will be exempt from Cap and Trade charges. That will be nice for the Chinese who get jobs that Americans used to have. Maybe your job.

Please tell your Congress: CO2 is okay by you, or face the biggest tax increase in the history of the U.S.

The economic slavery you prevent may be your own.

Contact your Representative here. Al Gore as been on the phone all week, and the last time that happened, the second largest oil reserve in the U.S. got handed to a big oil company. No joke.
__________

Related Posts:

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Today's Massacre in Tehran


You can't say it better than this:

Published at Bookworm Room:

I got this email from Steve Schippert:

It’s graphic. There is no nuance. And it’s why I am done debating otherwise intelligent friends on the aptness, nay brilliance, of our president’s near silence in condemnation of the Iranian regime which today executed its own Tienanmen Square in central Tehran.

[snipped graphic photograph]

Bludgeoning women to death, who represent the greatest true threat to the regime. Herding bus loads of Iranians into the square and then unleashing hundreds of Basij upon them from their concealed staging area - a street-side mosque. With axes, rifles, hand guns, clubs and gas, they commenced the killing spree; throwing people off of pedestrian bridges, gang beating defenseless women, shooting into the crowd and wading into them with axes.

[snip]

Today, I am done entertaining excuses for moral cowardice. Done.

My tears earlier today have given way to rage. Rage at a regime so brutally murdering the unarmed and peaceful. Rage at those who make eloquent excuses for a man who hesitates “because we don’t know how this is going to turn out.”

Yes we do. Count them. Quietly. To yourself.

__________

Related posts:

Biggest Tax Increase in History Up for Vote This Friday!

Yesterday, proponents of Cap and Trade cut a last-minute deal with powerful American agriculturists that makes passage of the Waxman-Markley Cap and Trade bill (H. R. 2454) much more likely. Phil Kerpen, Policy Director of Americans for Prosperity described this horrific new tax burden at The Fox Forum:
Obama’s proposed Kyoto-style cap-and-trade plan would be the biggest tax increase in American history. It would hit every American who fills a gas tank, pays an electric bill, or buys anything that has to be grown, shipped, or manufactured.

Cap-and-trade is a way to impose a massive energy tax and pretend it’s not a tax. It puts a cap on overall greenhouse gas emissions, and establishes a market for companies to buy and sell the permits. In Obama’s version, the permits would all be auctioned off and the hundreds of billions of dollars would be used to fund higher government spending.

The hardest hit will be those least able to pay: lower income families, who spend a disproportionate share of their income on energy.

The so-called cap-and-trade energy tax would, according to the president himself, force energy prices to go way up. In an unguarded moment, speaking to The San Francisco Chronicle last year, Obama said: “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket… they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”

The economic impact of imposing these huge new costs on energy consumers would be devastating. Even using the Obama administration’s own numbers, it would amount to a tax hike of $645.7 billion over the first 8 years, over $80 billion per year.

But as the cap becomes more and more strict over time, those costs would skyrocket into the trillions of dollars.

Prepare to be scared out of your socks if you read the entire article by Phil Kerpen, Policy Director of Americans for Prosperity.

Only a mighty response from the American public to Congress can stop this bill.

Call, fax, write.

Contact your Representative here.

__________

Related Posts:




"Don't Get Sick after June": Congress Does Health Care

Constant Conservative brought readers' attention to an article in Commentary Magazine in which business and financial historian, John Steele Gordon, writes about the failure of three U.S. run health systems: the Indian Health Service, the Veterans Administration, and Medicare.

The Indian Health Service, Gordon pointed out:

delivers what it is pleased to call health care to two million American Indians living on reservations in thirty-five states. “Don’t get sick after June” is the standard advice, for by then the money allocated by Congress has mostly run out.

Indians on reservations are usually poor and often suffer from very high rates of alcoholism, obesity, and the problems that come with those conditions, such as high blood pressure and diabetes. But as the Associated Press reports, “Indian health clinics often are ill-equipped to deal with such high rates of disease, and poor clinics do not have enough money to focus on preventive care. The main problem is a lack of federal money. American Indian programs are not a priority for Congress, which provided the health service with $3.6 billion this budget year.” That’s an annual budget of a measly $1,800 per Indian. No wonder the health statistics of a people that have been guaranteed free health care by the federal government since 1787 are so terrible.

And then there's the "even larger federal health care system, for veterans":

When it was found that thousands of veterans were put at risk for HIV, hepatitis, and other infectious diseases by improperly sterilized equipment used in colonoscopies last February, an investigation was ordered. Three months later, it seems that not much has been done about the problem.

Of course, there's also Medicare, the U.S. government's health insurance program for people age 65 or older. It's a real treat for paperwork lovers, as I can personally attest from much experience wheeling aged relatives through its labyrinthian paths. If a Medicare recipient makes one of a number of teeny-weeny-eensy-beansy little paperwork errors, finding his or her way back into the Medicare Labyrinth can be a paperwork challenge equal to solving the New York Times crossword puzzle, except that it requires much more exertion and will take longer.

That might be because there is not just one Medicare. No. That would be so ungovernmentlike. There are four Medicares: A, B, C, and D. Courses on how to apply for Medicare A, B, C, and D are not only available, but recommended. No problem though. One could hardly expect anything but paperwork perfection from an elderly person who, on a good day, may be experiencing seriously declining memory, vision, hearing, and ambulation, among other faculties. Falling through the Medicare cracks is so common that, in some places, government programs even exist to help catch people who fall through those cracks. Of course, those programs come with their own sets of paperwork challenges.

Paperwork versus convenience. Based on your own personal experience, which do you think your federal government will choose?

As far as I can tell, the most effective way to keep health care costs down was perfected by Congress as a by-product of Medicare: Make it so damn difficult to apply and stay on track that old sick people on minuscule budgets who are legally quite eligible for health care benefits don't know that they are eligible, can't figure out how to access those benefits, or are too sick and infirm to access those benefits. That's a real cost-cutter. And it insures that the people most in need get beat to the benefits door by the semi-pro system manipulators who have been milking the system for their entire lives.

Despite the skill of Congress in making an entire segment of the population eligible for a benefit that many of them will never be able to access, Medicare is still a financial flop, accounting as it does for an enormous chunk of our national budget deficit and poised to account for a much bigger chunk of our national debt, a chunk so big that Obama is offering to reduce Medicare costs by folding Medicare into his nationalized health care program.

Huh? I have heard otherwise lucid-appearing people buy Obama's argument that a big government-run health care program can be made less expensive by extending it to include the entire population of the U.S. plus anyone who shows up here from any country, legally or illegally.

Back to Gordon:

I have an idea. Why not have the federal government demonstrate that it can provide adequate health care to American Indians, a promise it hasn’t kept for 222 years? Then demonstrate it can provide adequate health care to veterans, a promise it hasn’t kept for 79 years. Then demonstrate that it can reform and efficiently run the health insurance system called Medicare, which it has been been making a dog’s breakfast of for the last 44 years. And then, and only then, take over all of American health care.

Do the right thing. Call or write at least one congressman or senator today. Remember that, no matter what, they'll have Cadillac health coverage for the rest of their lives, so they won't quite get what you are talking about. (Cadillac is a GM product, but contact Congress anyway.) Obamacare is a life-changer, in a bad way.

  • Representatives' names and addresses here. Email and fax numbers here.
  • Senators' name and contact information here.

__________

Related Posts:

The Obamacare Video You Must See

Deficit Spending: Suicidal Pickpockets at Work


Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Obama Plans for U.S./Iran Independence Day Picnics Still On!

Speaking about Iran yesterday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said, "If you watch the images that are on television screens ... I think that's clear, that justice has not been achieved."

With young people and even children dying in the streets of Iran, and injured people being hauled out of hospitals by police/thugs, could we call that an understatement?

But he insisted that Mr Obama's offer for diplomatic talks remained on the table.

He said: "Our long-term security interests, as it relates to the support of terrorism and their pursuit of a nuclear weapon, haven't changed. But our focus right now is not on that."

The State Department said invitations still stood for Iranian diplomats to visit US embassy barbecues on the July 4 national holiday for the first time since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Beyond belief.

July 4th is only 11 days from now.

State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said: "We have made a strategic decision to engage on a number of fronts with Iran.

"We tried many years of isolation, and we're pursuing a different path now."
Like partying together as Iranian seekers of political freedom are ruthlessly murdered and are buried.

Hope and change. Do champions of Obama really want to take moral responsibility for this?
__________
Related Posts:

Obama Eats Ice Cream While Iran Burns
Messages from Iran: The Cost of Imagining Free Speech


The Obamacare Video You Must See







A Fight for our Way of Life: Socialized Medicine vs. A Voice from Our Past




~ Representatives' names and addresses here. Email and fax numbers here.

~ Senators' name and contact information here.









__________